He called himself lazy, Turnoi. Not me. Although I do agree with his definition given the rest of his post!
I am not the moral police, self-appointed or otherwise. Calling a teacher lazy for saying they do the bare minimum for their classes is a fair assessment, because doing the bare minimum IS lazy. You just want something new to insult me over, and you appear to have gone to the extreme of changing the definition of words in order to do so!
I also never said he was a bad person, being a bad teacher is not synonymous with being a bad person. From his posts he seems quite genial. I wouldn't want to work with him as lazy teachers are not good colleagues. But that doesn't mean I think he's a bad person; it's only you and your 'crew' that have trouble separating specifics with generalisations!
As for the parting insult regarding my looks, I'm perfectly happy with the way I look and I often get 'looked at' when I'm out. If the best you can do is insult my looks, by all means go ahead, maybe you'll have better luck with that than you do with insulting my character or intelligence... It's all you can do given you can't do it by refuting my posts with anything resembling a valid argument!
- Re: Doing the bare minimum is not laziness! -- Beth -- 2014-10-03