Would you perhaps agree that the standards for standing or not standing with people in this respect are the same for the two of us or not?

Who do you think I'm standing with? I think you'll find if you look back at the thread I've disagreed with Veloce quite often, it just hasn't resulted in insults and smoke-screening that drag out the contested point until it's stretched so thin it's transparent!

I understand you have had troubles with posters in the past who you say are low-lives or fakes, but seeing as until a few days ago you were sure that I was that same person you now say Veloce is, you must understand my scepticism regarding your assessment of the identity of people.

I believe we (you and I) are making progress, which is a good thing given our agreement on the majority of issues. My only worry is that you defend CT for things you would have torn me a new one for saying!

I'm not asking that you disown him, just admit that somebody who happily admits to doing the bare minimum for his classes might.not be the paragon of teaching you claimed him to be.