I bet you can't reply to this input in substance either except with a bit of your usual rants, and that is because you are such "a damn good teacher".

Again, I have replied to each of your points already, it is there for you and everyone else to see. You are the one who has failed to address these rebuttals.

To recap:

The "rule" you have "discovered" for teaching articles is to simply equate the Chinese with the English. This is jot a groundbreaking discovery. It is what language teachers all over the world do on a daily basis. It is what language teaching is. It doesn't need an indepth reply as it is not an indepth concept.

You have now highlighted three obvious typos I have made; ironically whilst highlighting my typo also making them yourself! This is not the same as when you used the wrong grammar in your posts. Which I not only highlighted but also explained the mistakes present. All you have done is highlight an obvious typo.

You have proven your lack of knowledge about the DELTA qualification time and again. The information is there, read it. You also write with the implication I do not posess a degree, when in fact not only do I hold a degree, I also hold a PGCE. The DELTA is a qualification for language teachers and is an excellent qualification to hold.

All other points have been refuted and refuted over and over again, anyone who can read can see that. I suggest you read back before going on another of your rants and wasting even more of your time.